Volkswagen Locks Vehicle Horsepower, Unlocks Full Power via Subscription
JohnAug 19, 2025, 10:38 AM
[PCauto] Volkswagen Group has officially confirmed the launch of a “Performance Boost” subscription service for select 2025 electric vehicle models. This subscription requires owners to pay a monthly fee in order to unlock the car’s full performance.
In the initial phase, the program will cover MEB-based models such as the ID.4 and ID.5. For example, the base version of the ID.4 has its motor output capped at 201 hp. By paying $15–$50 per month (approximately 488 THB/64 MYR–1,627 THB/212 MYR), owners can increase output to 234 hp along with additional torque.
The service is enabled via OTA updates. European customers can already purchase it through the “Volkswagen We” app, while a North American rollout is planned for Q4 2025.
Designed with Built-In Performance Reserves
According to Volkswagen’s technical white paper, the feature works on a hardware-preinstalled + software-limited basis, meaning the subscription service simply lifts the electronic control unit (ECU) software lock. The MEB platform was engineered with hardware redundancy from the start.
Take the ID.4 as an example: its permanent magnet synchronous motor is technically capable of producing 250 hp, but the ECU limits output at the factory.
This setup is similar to unlocking DLC content in a gaming console—no physical hardware changes are needed. Once the subscription is activated, the ID.4’s 0–100 km/h acceleration improves from 7.1 seconds to 6.3 seconds, with energy consumption rising by only 2%. Importantly, boosting the motor output does not affect battery cycle life or warranty coverage. The approach mirrors Tesla’s “Acceleration Boost” model.
In the UK, the ID.3 Pro is the first to offer the service, with three payment options: £16.5 per month (about 95 MYR), £165 per year (about 942 MYR), or a one-time buyout of £649 (about 3,703 MYR).
Spending a fortune on a car that isn’t truly yours
The launch of the service quickly triggered backlash, with the hashtag #FreeTheHorsepower spreading over 120,000 times in a single day on social media. Some consumers voiced frustration: “After paying more than $40,000 for the car, I still need to keep paying for its core performance.”
Automakers are redefining vehicle ownership through software licensing agreements. What consumers actually purchase is more like a combination of hardware usage rights plus limited software authorization, rather than full ownership of the car in the traditional sense.
The main reason automakers are taking this path is the significant revenue potential of subscription services. According to industry estimates, if the market embraces software-based services, they could account for up to 35% of Volkswagen Group’s profits by 2030. The new performance subscription, therefore, serves as a real-world test of customers’ willingness to pay.
At the same time, this strategy reflects a harsher financial reality. Bernstein’s analysis shows that the MEB platform delivers just a 3.8% profit margin per vehicle, far below the 18.6% margin of the Tesla Model Y. In this context, subscriptions stand out as one of the few viable levers Volkswagen has to improve profitability.
Attempts to Roll out Subscription Services, but Most Failed
Volkswagen’s bold move is widely seen as an experiment in the traditional industry’s shift toward “software-defined vehicles.”
From the consumer’s perspective, however, it feels unfair: after spending a large sum of money to buy a car, owners still find themselves restricted by the manufacturer, forced to pay extra to unlock certain hardware or functions. This makes many feel as if they don’t truly own their car, but are merely renting it.
There is also growing concern that automakers might expand the scope of subscription services in the future, potentially limiting vehicle speed, battery capacity, or driving range—an idea that many customers find unacceptable.
If any infringement occurs, please contact us for deletionFollow Us
Trending News
Tesla Ordered to Refund $10,600 per Owner over HW3’s Incompatibility with FSD Upgrade
RobertJul 08, 2025, 12:12 PM
【PCauto】The California court recently ruled in a class-action lawsuit against Tesla, ordering the company to refund the cost of the “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) package to some early vehicle owners, with each refund amounting to $10,600, as well as to cover relevant litigation expenses. The ruling stems from owners’ allegations that Tesla failed to deliver on its FSD functionality promises.
The Case Stems from Tesla Cars Made Before 2019 That Couldn’t Upgrade to FSD
The heart of the case is Tesla cars made before 2019. These vehicles came with the Hardware 3.0 system, which was supposed to support future Full Self-Driving features. According to evidence from the plaintiffs, Tesla had clearly promised during sales that all cars with HW3.0 would be able to get full FSD through future OTA software updates.
But in reality, owners found that the FSD features in their cars stayed in the Beta stage for a long time. What they got were basic functions like recognizing traffic lights and stop signs. This was far from the fully autonomous driving Tesla had promised. Many owners believed this was misleading and accused the company of false advertising.
Technical Limits Explain Why FSD Promises Could Not Be Met
HW3.0 hardware has a computing power of 144 TOPS, which means 144 trillion operations per second. The industry has moved forward, and Tesla later released HW4.0, which offers between 260 and 500 TOPS. This shows that HW3.0 does not have enough power to handle the full FSD features. These include advanced functions like complex city driving assistance, such as City NOA.
Tesla later upgraded some new models to HW4.0 hardware. They also offered a paid upgrade option for some owners, costing about $1,000. However, the court said this did not solve the main problem caused by the original HW3.0 promises. It was also not seen as a practical fix for all affected owners.
During the lawsuit, Tesla said FSD was a feature still being developed. They argued buyers should have known it was a work in progress. Functions would improve over time, but there were uncertainties.
However, the court found a big gap between Tesla’s promises and reality. Tesla had promised that cars with HW3.0 would get full FSD features. But they failed to deliver on that promise for a long time. Because of this, the court sided with the owners and approved their refund requests.
The Ruling Warns the Auto Industry to Avoid Overpromising
This ruling sends a clear warning to the global auto industry. It is especially important for companies that promote advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and self-driving technology.
The message is simple. When advertising features that rely on software updates and future improvements, companies must be careful with their wording. They need to clearly separate the current driver assistance functions from the goal of full self-driving. This helps avoid making promises they cannot keep.
If any infringement occurs, please contact us for deletionFollow Us
Trending News
Proton X70 interior design fully revealed: Suitable for both home and business use【PCauto】Proton X70, with its outstanding design, rich features, and affordable price, has quickly become a popular choice in the mid-size SUV market. As a C-segment SUV, the Proton X70 not only showcases modern and sporty aesthetics in its exterior, but its Proton X70 interior is also centered on “modern technology and comfortable experience,” offering a high-quality driving environment.Whether for family users or business professionals, the Proton X70 can meet diverse needs. Next, we will comprJohnJul 7, 2025Proton Saga Interior Review: Affordable Yet Stylish for Everyday Use【PCauto】The Proton Saga has been a household name in Malaysia since 1985. Known for its affordable pricing and reliable performance, it remains a top choice for budget-conscious drivers. As an A-segment sedan, the Proton Saga delivers strong value across key areas like comfort, safety, and everyday practicality. Whether you’re commuting to work or heading out with the family, the Proton Saga interior offers just enough space and features to keep things simple and efficient.WilliamJul 17, 2025Tesla Ordered to Refund $10,600 per Owner over HW3’s Incompatibility with FSD Upgrade【PCauto】 The California court has ruled against Tesla in a recent class-action lawsuit, ordering the company to pay $10,600 to some early owners who bought the Full Self-Driving (FSD) package. Tesla will also need to cover legal costs. The case was brought by owners who say the company never delivered the FSD features it had promised.RobertJul 8, 2025Check Road Tax Online in Malaysia: A Quick 5-Minute Guide for Car Owners[PCauto] As a car owner in Malaysia, it’s your responsibility to check road tax online regularly to make sure your vehicle is legal on the road and free from any JPJ fines. What used to mean standing in long queues at JPJ can now be done easily from home. Knowing how to check road tax status online gives you peace of mind. It’s fast, convenient, and takes just a few minutes to confirm whether your road tax is still valid.WilliamJul 8, 2025BYD to launch all-new B5 in the UK, aiming to rival the Land Rover Defender【PCauto】BYD is set to introduce the all-new B5, a premium SUV, to the UK in 2026. Positioned to take on the iconic Land Rover Defender, the B5 signals BYD’s bold entry into a segment long dominated by British brands. This marks a key milestone for Chinese automakers in the luxrious off-road market.AshleyJul 4, 2025
Vie
